Now that the election is over and Donald Trump has been elected to return to the White House, the new administration is poised to name Elon Musk as the head of a newly formed Government agency: Department of Government Efficiency (DoGE). While this appointment may be viewed as either a refreshing change, or terrifying thought, at the Tax Project Institute we want to stick to our nonpartisan values and discuss what those changes might mean.
If, as expected, Elon Musk is appointed to head this agency it seems reasonable to assume he will bring new and potentially dramatically different approaches to Government spending and is likely to streamline government operations and slash federal spending as he has done with other organizations like Twitter. While other Government efficiency effort have been done before, these ambitious goals include cutting the federal budget as stated by $2 trillion could and will dramatically reshape the scope and scale of Government, and potentially the services provided, as well as the impact of Government on the Economics of our country. This bold fiscal policy aims to address the nation’s spiraling deficit and ballooning national debt, while simultaneously promoting a more transparent, data-driven government will have deep and lasting impacts on our country if enacted.
Musk’s reputation for innovation and unconventional thinking is expected to drive a focus on technology and efficiency across federal agencies, potentially paving the way for significant cost reductions. However, achieving these cuts while maintaining essential services raises complex challenges, especially as the government confronts rising interest payments on the national debt and an ongoing annual deficit exceeding $1 trillion. This article delves into the prospects and concerns surrounding this new administration’s fiscal direction, particularly in the context of transparency and public accountability, alongside a list of aspirations that citizens have for a more open government.
Prospects and Challenges for a $2 Trillion Budget Reduction
The goal of reducing federal spending by $2 trillion is both promising and fraught with potential challenges. Given that the US Federal Government Revenue was $4.5 trillion1, the act of removing $2 trillion (more than 44%) would be a significant undertaking. As likely the most ambitious target proposed by any administration, this cut has far-reaching implications, particularly in relation to deficit reduction and debt management. Below are several anticipated effects, both positive and challenging, of enacting such a substantial fiscal policy.
1. Progress in Deficit and Debt Reduction: With the national debt surpassing $35 trillion and continuing to grow, and annual budget deficits more than $1 trillion, a $2 trillion reduction in Government spending could provide a substantial offset to the deficit, potentially balancing the budget over time with fiscal discipline. If successful, this could also ease the government’s debt burden, reducing the need for borrowing and interest payments that account for a growing share of federal expenditures. As we reduce our National Debt and Interest on Debt, that could free the country to increase spending on higher priority items of need.
2. Risk to Essential Public Services: Federal spending cuts of this magnitude are bound to affect a range of public services. Mandatory spending programs, such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, currently consume a large portion of the budget, leaving discretionary spending—including defense, education, and infrastructure—at risk of major reductions. The challenge for the new administration and the DoGE will be to identify areas for efficient cost-cutting without diminishing critical services. Roughly two thirds of the Federal Budget are considered Entitlements and are legally mandated by law. So, both Fiscal AND Legislative changes are likely required to achieve significant cuts, or major changes in Entitlement programs which will have to be addressed if cuts are expected to approach anything near $2 trillion. These could take the form in Social Security updates like changes to retirement eligibility, increases in contributions, or reductions in benefits. It may also include items to put them on better fiscal paths like having Social Security funds invest in capital markets versus Treasuries for higher and more sustainable returns. It could also include the creation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund.
3. Economic Ripple Effects: Federal spending creates demand and economic activity, particularly in times of downturns, by providing funding to numerous sectors. If the Government was making wise investments with good future returns for the Economy, then reducing the budget will slow contributions to GDP, with potential implications for employment and economic stability in areas reliant on federal contracts and support. While it is unlikely that significant portions of Government investments have positive ROI, there of course will be some. A careful balance is needed to avoid inadvertently disrupting the economy, especially in critical industries such as defense, education, and healthcare.
4. Interest Payments on the National Debt: The U.S. government currently spends a significant portion of its budget on interest payments for the national debt (basically the national credit card fees). Reducing the deficit and limiting further debt accumulation could help stabilize and over time reduce these interest obligations, freeing up funds for other initiatives. However, such an outcome hinges on the administration’s ability to sustain spending cuts without compromising economic performance or resorting to additional borrowing. The interest alone on our National Debt exceeded $1 trillion dollars2 this year, surpassing the US Military budget as the 3rd largest item on the Federal Budget. (See our Debt Clock to see what we could buy instead)
Hopes for Greater Transparency and Accountability
Beyond fiscal reform, the public’s expectation for transparency remains high. With Musk overseeing government efficiency initiatives it appears likely he will use a technology-driven approach to transparency that hopefully enhances public access to information. These priorities reflect a collective desire by Americans for an open government that promotes citizen engagement and holds itself accountable. Key areas of focus include:
1. Open and Accessible Government Data: Making government data more accessible is central to fostering public trust and enabling citizen oversight. This includes ensuring that data on federal spending, program effectiveness, and agency performance are freely available and easy to navigate. Providing open data also enables journalists, researchers, and citizens to independently monitor government actions, thereby enhancing accountability.
2. Reliable and Authoritative Data Sources: To improve the quality of publicly available information, there should be a single, authoritative source for government data, similar to how agencies like the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) provide budget and financial reports. Centralizing these data sources would improve consistency and reliability, helping the public make more informed assessments of government initiatives. There should not be a dozen budget values for the same data on a dozen government websites. Citizens should not have to navigate this maze and determine what is real.
3. Real-Time and Updated Data Access: Providing timely access to government data could allow for better tracking of government operations. Currently, data lags and gaps sometimes prevent the public from seeing an accurate picture of federal spending and performance. Real-time data availability would facilitate more immediate oversight, enabling citizens and watchdogs to identify trends and inefficiencies as they happen when agencies and officials can be held accountable. Negligence, Omission, Ignorance, or Incompetence should not shield those accountable for performing for the American citizen.
4. Centralized and Standardized Government Systems: One of the challenges in promoting transparency is the fragmentation of data across multiple departments and agencies each having their own separate systems and practices. A centralized system for government data, with standardized formats and reporting practices, would streamline access and reduce the burden of sifting through disparate data sources and simplify Government accounting and hopefully lead to increased efficiency.
5. Promoting an API Economy: Enabling API (Application Programming Interface) access to government data would encourage the development of tools, dashboards, and other applications that present this information in user-friendly formats. An API economy would allow developers to build tools for the public to access and analyze government data in new ways, expanding transparency efforts and driving innovation in how the public interacts with government information.
6. Reporting Transparency: Having the Government produce similar annual and quarterly reporting like that used for public corporations would greatly benefit transparency. In the private sector, public companies are required to file statements of financial health and transparency annually and quarterly. These 10K and 10Q statements are standardized and easily comparable between companies and provide a historical view that can be used to make assessments of past and future performance. Similarly, if the government provided a similar 10K/10Q reporting would be a major step forward in transparency. Some groups like USAFacts.org have attempted to produce a government 10K but an official 10K that would require an audited financial statement and officer signoff would be a major step forward in transparency and accountability.
The Department of Government Efficiency: Elon Musk’s Role
The creation of the DoGE, with Musk at its helm, would symbolize the new administration’s drive to bring private-sector efficiency to federal operations. Given Musk’s track record of disruptive innovation at companies like Tesla and SpaceX, his appointment may signal a move toward leveraging technology, automation, and streamlined processes to minimize waste and maximize productivity within government agencies. Below are some potential avenues Musk might explore to achieve these goals.
1. Technological Innovation for Cost Reduction: Musk’s experience with automation and artificial intelligence (AI) could translate into technological upgrades for government operations. Automation could reduce administrative costs, freeing up resources for other priorities, while AI could be used to analyze data and streamline decision-making processes. However, implementing such changes on a government-wide scale would require balancing efficiency with service quality.
2. Cultivating Private-Sector Accountability Standards: The private sector often enforces accountability and cost-efficiency as core values, and Musk’s leadership could promote a similar culture within federal agencies. This could lead to a reduction in wasteful spending and a renewed focus on delivering measurable results. However, government operations differ significantly from private enterprises, and accountability standards must consider the unique public-service mission of government work.
3. Balancing Efficiency with Public Needs: While the private sector emphasizes efficiency, the government must provide essential services and maintain levels of service in many areas where a private company would not be economically feasible, or large capital projects only possible with state level funding. As Musk’s DoGE explores ways to reduce costs, it will need to ensure that essential services remain accessible to all citizens. This balancing act may require adjustments to private-sector principles to fit the public-interest framework of government services, and a dialogue between the public and private sector on what services and quality levels are acceptable. Defining Government Services, Service Levels, and Scope for each Government agency would go along way at standardizing services to the public. There is likely to be widescale disagreements finding the balance.
A Path Toward Fiscal Responsibility and Public Trust
With the incoming administration’s ambitious goals for a government that is financially responsible, innovative, and accountable many are hoping that they play equal weight on balancing against the negative consequences if done poorly. The proposed $2 trillion budget cut, while fraught with challenges, represents a meaningful step toward addressing the national debt and reducing the deficit.
Yet, achieving these savings will require a delicate balance, as well as the guidance of a government that prioritizes public needs alongside fiscal restraint. As the new administration takes office, the public’s hope for openness, innovation, accountability, and balance against negative impacts remain high. These aspirations reflect a broader desire for a government that is both efficient and responsive to the needs of its citizens, paving the way for a future
Citations
