The American Dream: Origins and Evolution

The American Dream

The American Dream is one of the most enduring ideas in the United States. It’s more than a slogan—it’s a belief that through hard work, determination, and opportunity, anyone can succeed. For generations, America was viewed as the land where you could start with nothing and, through grit and initiative, rise to success. Nowhere else in the world, it was believed, offered the same level of upward mobility or access to possibility.

Unlike most nations, the United States was not founded on shared ethnicity, religion, or royal lineage, but on ideals. Margaret Thatcher once famously said, “Europe was created by history. America was created by philosophy.” [1] America’s founding was deeply philosophical—anchored in Enlightenment principles of liberty, individual rights, and merit. It was built by people willing to take extraordinary risks to start something entirely new, united not by bloodlines but by belief in a better system. These founding ideals—that individuals should be free to pursue happiness and reach their potential—laid the groundwork for what became the American Dream.

For most of American history, each successive generation has experienced a higher standard of living than the one before. Rising incomes, improved health outcomes, increased educational attainment, and access to homeownership were consistent markers of generational progress throughout the 20th century. According to the Pew Research Center, 84% of Americans born in 1940 earned more than their parents did at the same age, adjusted for inflation. This sense of progress became an essential part of the Dream’s promise [4].

Origins of a Dream

The phrase “American Dream” was coined by Pulitzer Prize-winning historian James Truslow Adams in his 1931 book The Epic of America. Writing in the depths of the Great Depression, Adams sought to clarify what made America unique. His definition of the Dream was:

“The American Dream is that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement. It is a difficult dream for the European upper classes to interpret adequately, and too many of us ourselves have grown weary and mistrustful of it. It is not a dream of motor cars and high wages merely, but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position.” [2]

James Truslow Adams

Adams was influenced by the ideals of the American Founding—especially the Declaration of Independence and the belief that “all men are created equal” and endowed with “unalienable Rights” including “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” He believed America was set apart by its dedication to opportunity over aristocracy, merit over birth. As historian Sarah Churchwell notes in Behold, America, Adams was pushing back against a rising materialism and sought to reclaim the moral dimension of the American experience [3].

He emphasized that the Dream was not simply about wealth, but about the chance to grow, contribute, and be recognized—to live a life of meaning and self-determination. America uniquely allowed people to escape societal limitations and imagine a better life, not through privilege but through perseverance.

At its heart, the American Dream is about striving to become the best version of yourself. It’s about unlocking your potential through talent, hard work, and opportunity. The American Dream gave people the belief and opportunity to reach for something greater—to not just survive, but to thrive. A place where you could build your dreams and make them a reality. That spirit of ambition and self-betterment is what has drawn millions to America’s shores and continues to define the nation’s promise.

Evolution of the Dream

The American Dream has continued to evolve; it expanded alongside the nation. From agrarian beginnings and waves of immigration to industrial might, suburban sprawl to Economic Super Power, the dream evolved with every generation. While the term wasn’t coined until the 20th century, the underlying ethos was present in every step of America’s development. The lived experience for each generation continues to change, here are some of the changes:

Post-War Boom (1945–1965):
The U.S. economy boomed post WWII, and a new middle class emerged. Government programs like the GI Bill provided millions of veterans with home loans and access to higher education. Median household income rose from about $3,300 in 1950 (about $36,000 today) to $6,900 in 1970 (about $54,000 today) [4]. The average home cost just 2.2x the median income. College tuition at public universities was typically under $1,000 annually. Healthcare costs were modest—just 4.5% of GDP in 1960 [5]. The dream of a comfortable life expanded for a large number of Americans.

Household Cost Pie (1950s)

1970s–1980s: Inflation and Transition
From 1973 to 1982, inflation averaged nearly 9% per year. Median home prices rose from $24,000 in 1970 to $64,600 in 1980 [6]. Real wages stagnated. Healthcare spending grew rapidly, reaching 8.8% of GDP by 1980 [5]. Dual-income households became the norm.

Household Cost Pie (1980s)

1990s–2000s: Growth with a Cost
The tech boom and globalization expanded the economy but introduced volatility and expanding wealth disparities. College tuition at public universities hit $3,800 in 1990. Median home prices reached $120,000. By 2007, student loan debt averaged $18,000. Healthcare spending rose to 16.6% of GDP [5].

Household Cost Pie (2000s)

2010s–Today: Uneven Recovery and New Uncertainty
Following the Great Recession, economic growth returned, but unevenly. In 2023, average student loan debt exceeded $37,000. Homeownership among under-35s dropped below 40% [7]. Median rent in urban areas surpassed $2,000/month. Real wages rose only 5% from 2000 to 2020 [8]. Inflation from 2021 to 2023 echoed 1980s highs.

Household Cost Pie (2020s)

The composition of Household Expenditures continues to evolve with Housing, Healthcare, Student Debt, and Taxes taking larger portions of expenses, reducing Other expenditures including Discretionary spending all of which can alter sentiment.

Rising Costs of Government

The cost of the Federal Government continues to rise from less than 3% in 1929 to a peak of 30% during the COVID pandemic to roughly a quarter of the GDP today.

The Dream Today

The belief in the American Dream still resonates today, though how people define continues to evolve. For some, it’s still about homeownership and a stable job and more material means. For others, it’s about freedom of choice, living with dignity, and having the opportunity to pursue what matters most to them. Despite economic uncertainty, the idea remains a powerful motivator.

Some say the Dream is dead, that upward mobility and improving quality of life are fading and studies show that only 50% of Americans born in 1980 earn more than their parents at the same age compared to 90% in 1940. [10,11]

“The American Dream is not dead, but it is on life support—especially for those outside the upper classes.”

Brookings

While Pew Research shows only 37% of Americans believe the next generation will be better off than the last [9], the U.S. continues to offer unmatched opportunity in many areas. America leads not only in tech, biotech, green energy, and education, but also in innovation, entrepreneurship, cultural influence, scientific research, and capital and financial markets. From arts and entertainment to global philanthropy, the U.S. provides a platform for people to make a global impact. The promise of the Dream—to reach one’s full potential regardless of background—still exists, though it may be harder to attain than before.

Keeping the Dream Alive

The American Dream was never meant to be a finished product; it has always been a work in progress. We’re currently faced with many challenges including more than 20 years of structural budget deficits, historic national debt, ballooning interest payments on the debt, rapidly rising healthcare costs, exploding student debt, inflation and stagnating wages, greater global competition and AI and Climate Change clouds on the horizon. So preserving the Dream for future Americans will take a commitment, in something we pass to future generations as our parents did for us. The Dream was built not just for the comfort of the present generation, but for the benefit of those to come. That principle demands foresight, discipline, and sometimes, sacrifice.

To preserve and strengthen the Dream, we must make conscious choices today. Government Financial Literacy can help us better understand those choices—whether it’s how we fund education, invest in infrastructure, structure taxes, and how we manage debts, deficits and other obligations. A more informed public can help steer policy toward long-term prosperity, not just short-term gain.

We must recognize that preserving the Dream may require adjusting our expectations, rethinking what success looks like, and ensuring opportunity is not limited to the privileged few. If we value a society where hard work and character matter more than birth or connections, we have to build and protect the institutions that make that possible.

Final Thoughts

The American Dream once defined the America as unique: upwardly mobile, open, a land of opportunities where you could go as far as your talent and ambitions could take you. While the path has narrowed, and some say it was always a myth, the belief and the opportunities endure. It must be adapted to fit new realities without losing its essence. With effort and clarity, the Dream can once again inspire and unify. It remains not just an idea of what America was, but what it still can be.


Citation

[1] Margaret Thatcher, quoted in various speeches/interviews (c. 1980s). Commonly cited variant: “Europe was created by history. America was created by philosophy.”

[2] Adams, James Truslow. The Epic of America. Little, Brown & Co., 1931.

[3] Churchwell, Sarah. Behold, America: The Entangled History of “America First” and “the American Dream”. Basic Books, 2018.

[4] Pew Research Center. “The Fading American Dream: Trends in Absolute Income Mobility Since 1940.” Based on analysis from the Equality of Opportunity Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/12/american-dream-global-views/

[5] U.S. Census Bureau. Historical Income Tables: Household. Table H-5. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-income-households.html

[6] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). National Health Expenditure Data. https://www.cms.gov

[7] Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED). Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States. https://fred.stlouisfed.org

[8] U.S. Census Bureau. Quarterly Homeownership Rates by Age and Region. https://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/data/index.html

[9] Pew Research Center. “Most Americans Say Children Will Be Worse Off Than Their Parents.” 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/06/27/americas-financial-future/

[10] Brookings Institute. Dream Horders 2017 https://www.brookings.edu/books/dream-hoarders/

[11] Science. The Fading American Dream 2017 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aal4617

Expense Sources:

The American Dream: Origins and Evolution

From Loophole Buster to Middle Class Menace: The Rise of AMT

1969. A year of moon landings, Woodstock, Tie Dye, the Summer of Love, Vietnam War protests, and less glamorously, the birth of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). What began as a narrow measure to prevent a handful of very wealthy individuals from exploiting tax loopholes has morphed into a complex beast, ensnaring millions of taxpayers, including the middle class.

 Born from Inequality

Imagine a world where billionaires could legally reduce their taxable income to zero – that is what sparked the AMT’s creation (Sound familiar?6). Congress, alarmed by reports of such tactics (In 1969!), devised this parallel tax system with stricter deductions and exemptions, aiming to ensure high earners paid their “fair share.”

 A Modest Beginning

Back then, the AMT targeted a tiny fraction of taxpayers – just 155 individuals in its first year1 making over $200,00 a year.4 It collected a mere $85 million, a drop in the ocean of federal revenue. Yet, it served its purpose, preventing blatant tax avoidance by the ultra-rich.

 The Unintended Creep

Fast forward to today. The AMT’s net has widened significantly, instead of the handful of extremely rich it is netting roughly 5 million taxpayers and is projected to catch 7 million by 2026 (See TCJA update). The culprit? Inflation and a lack of indexing. Unlike regular tax brackets, the AMT’s exemptions have not been adjusted for inflation, meaning increasingly middle-class Americans get swept up as their incomes rise with the cost of living. In 1969 when Congress passed AMT to today the Consumer Price Index from the Bureau of Labor and statistics based on annual inflation has risen a cumulative 900%. Which means a dollar in 1969 would be worth $9 today2.

The Price of “Fairness”

This unforeseen expansion creates a paradox. While the AMT still catches some high earners who game the system (or just follow what the law allows depending on your perspective), it now also burdens many individuals simply earning a decent living, and while well off, most do not consider themselves rich. For example, in contrast to those it was intended in 1969 making over $200K or over $1 million in current dollars, a family of 4 in San Francisco or New York making $250,000, while in the top 20th percentile of income, is by no means “rich” based on the cost of living in these areas and nowhere near the 1969 equivalent. This is especially true as many caught in AMT are wage earners that do not derive most of their income from investments, capital gains, or have businesses that have significant write offs. They face unexpected tax bills, negating deductions, and credits they otherwise may have relied on. This “invisible tax” can be financially devastating, pushing families into debt, and causing hardship for many in the middle class, and depriving them of wealth creation that can help them in their later years.

Overhead

While it did “catch” the very wealthy, it trapped what has become middle income (if upper middle) taxpayers in a much wider net. While roughly 5M million users are subject to AMT, 9.7M must calculate it even if they are not subjected to it.2 For these taxpayers they must calculate their taxes twice, once for their normal taxes and a second time for the AMT to determine the higher of the two. The Tax Foundation has estimated that this burden adds up to $4.6 billion on compliance overhead. 5

A Call for Reform

The unintended consequences of the AMT have ignited a debate. Critics argue it has become a regressive tax, disproportionately impacting the middle class for which it was never intended and undermining its original purpose of catching the very wealthy who were paying nothing. Some advocate for complete repeal, while others propose indexing adjustments and raising exemption levels. Members of both sides of the aisle including Bernie Sanders, and Ted Cruz have called for the complete elimination, while members like Hillary Clinton have proposed raising the limit significantly and adding a 2nd tier she refers to as the Buffet Rule for the Uber wealthy based on Warren Buffets calls for higher taxes on the very wealthy3. Many question the basic premise of AMT to begin with, the whole reason AMT exists is because of the maze of deductions in the Tax Code, especially available to business owners and higher net worth individuals. Congress enacted these for beneficial reasons, like economic incentives for growth or other areas the government wanted to incentivize. Having an alternate parallel tax system seems to defeat many of those incentives and calls into question why have all the incentives and complexity if you just turn around and create another level of complexity on top of it defeating the original purpose. Some might suggest this seems to be a fight between congress and itself.

Update: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

Well, amazingly after almost 50 years, major changes to the AMT and good news came in 2017. Prior to the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), approximately 5 million taxpayers were impacted by AMT. The TCJA increased the AMT’s exemption and exemption phaseout through 2025, reducing the number of taxpayers subject to the AMT, to an estimated 200,000.3 While this has been great news, it is set to expire next year and if so, we will be right back where we started. Hopefully, congress will correct this and make it permanent before it expires next year.

Citation

1.      Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) – Consumer Price Index (CPI) – annual inflation rate
https://www.bls.gov/cpi 

2.      Tax Foundation – Taxpayers subject to AMT
https://taxfoundation.org/blog/taxpayers-subject-alternative-minimum-tax/

3.      Tax Foundation – AMT Glossary
https://taxfoundation.org/taxedu/glossary/alternative-minimum-tax-amt/

4.      Tax Foundation – Background Individual AMT
https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/backgrounder-individual-alternative-minimum-tax-amt/

5.      Tax Foundation – The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Simplified the Tax Filing Process for Millions of Households https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-simplified-the-tax-filing-process-for-millions-of-americans/https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-simplified-the-tax-filing-process-for-millions-of-americans/

6.      Business Insider – Billionaires avoiding paying federal income tax
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-billionaires-avoid-paying-federal-income-tax-2021-6?op=1

From Loophole Buster to Middle Class Menace: The Rise of AMT

Tax Project Institute

Get the Newsletter

Sign up to get the newsletter